mirror of
1
Fork 0
forgejo/models/pull_sign.go

134 lines
3.7 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package models
import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/login"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
)
// SignMerge determines if we should sign a PR merge commit to the base repository
func (pr *PullRequest) SignMerge(u *user_model.User, tmpBasePath, baseCommit, headCommit string) (bool, string, *git.Signature, error) {
if err := pr.LoadBaseRepo(); err != nil {
log.Error("Unable to get Base Repo for pull request")
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
repo := pr.BaseRepo
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
signingKey, signer := SigningKey(repo.RepoPath())
if signingKey == "" {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{noKey}
}
rules := signingModeFromStrings(setting.Repository.Signing.Merges)
var gitRepo *git.Repository
var err error
2020-07-31 15:26:47 +02:00
Loop:
for _, rule := range rules {
switch rule {
case never:
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{never}
case always:
2020-07-31 15:26:47 +02:00
break Loop
case pubkey:
keys, err := ListGPGKeys(u.ID, db.ListOptions{})
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
if len(keys) == 0 {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{pubkey}
}
case twofa:
twofaModel, err := login.GetTwoFactorByUID(u.ID)
if err != nil && !login.IsErrTwoFactorNotEnrolled(err) {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
if twofaModel == nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{twofa}
}
case approved:
protectedBranch, err := GetProtectedBranchBy(repo.ID, pr.BaseBranch)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
if protectedBranch == nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{approved}
}
if protectedBranch.GetGrantedApprovalsCount(pr) < 1 {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{approved}
}
case baseSigned:
if gitRepo == nil {
gitRepo, err = git.OpenRepository(tmpBasePath)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
defer gitRepo.Close()
}
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(baseCommit)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
verification := ParseCommitWithSignature(commit)
if !verification.Verified {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{baseSigned}
}
case headSigned:
if gitRepo == nil {
gitRepo, err = git.OpenRepository(tmpBasePath)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
defer gitRepo.Close()
}
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(headCommit)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
verification := ParseCommitWithSignature(commit)
if !verification.Verified {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{headSigned}
}
case commitsSigned:
if gitRepo == nil {
gitRepo, err = git.OpenRepository(tmpBasePath)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
defer gitRepo.Close()
}
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(headCommit)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
verification := ParseCommitWithSignature(commit)
if !verification.Verified {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{commitsSigned}
}
// need to work out merge-base
mergeBaseCommit, _, err := gitRepo.GetMergeBase("", baseCommit, headCommit)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
commitList, err := commit.CommitsBeforeUntil(mergeBaseCommit)
if err != nil {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, err
}
for _, commit := range commitList {
verification := ParseCommitWithSignature(commit)
if !verification.Verified {
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return false, "", nil, &ErrWontSign{commitsSigned}
}
}
}
}
Add configurable Trust Models (#11712) * Add configurable Trust Models Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are - meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer. The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted keys. The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not the committer line are marked unmatched. The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model should they wish to. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Adjust locale strings Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * as per @6543 Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/gpg_key.go * Add migration for repository Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2020-09-19 18:44:55 +02:00
return true, signingKey, signer, nil
}