mirror of
1
Fork 0
forgejo/routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go

401 lines
11 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2021 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package repo
import (
"net/http"
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52) (cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1) (cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1dab4f6f3678d79a394da56e6447ebbe1) (cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7) (cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b) (cherry picked from commit 511c519c875a4c4e65c02ef0c4e3b941f4da4371) (cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f610837d34844bb79cda1360ab23b6b1c) (cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c449322901a0acf6d0857eac4716581) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a (cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9e4af612a628171bd4f63a24860c272) (cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d3e9e22017fd74045bcdc1109bd06df) (cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6dd177980f3d9f367122ffc2fec8986) (cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a490faeccb85088fa0981dd50f7199eb8) (cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c20e53ae616a7e53d63c3b51809585fb) (cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a747c14fb1b5b4271db6c10abbf86d586)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
"time"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/web"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/attachment"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/convert"
issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue"
)
// GetIssueCommentAttachment gets a single attachment of the comment
func GetIssueCommentAttachment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// swagger:operation GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}/assets/{attachment_id} issue issueGetIssueCommentAttachment
// ---
// summary: Get a comment attachment
// produces:
// - application/json
// parameters:
// - name: owner
// in: path
// description: owner of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: repo
// in: path
// description: name of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: id
// in: path
// description: id of the comment
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// - name: attachment_id
// in: path
// description: id of the attachment to get
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// responses:
// "200":
// "$ref": "#/responses/Attachment"
// "404":
// "$ref": "#/responses/error"
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
comment := ctx.Comment
attachment := getIssueCommentAttachmentSafeRead(ctx)
if attachment == nil {
return
}
if attachment.CommentID != comment.ID {
log.Debug("User requested attachment[%d] is not in comment[%d].", attachment.ID, comment.ID)
ctx.NotFound("attachment not in comment")
return
}
ctx.JSON(http.StatusOK, convert.ToAPIAttachment(ctx.Repo.Repository, attachment))
}
// ListIssueCommentAttachments lists all attachments of the comment
func ListIssueCommentAttachments(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// swagger:operation GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}/assets issue issueListIssueCommentAttachments
// ---
// summary: List comment's attachments
// produces:
// - application/json
// parameters:
// - name: owner
// in: path
// description: owner of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: repo
// in: path
// description: name of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: id
// in: path
// description: id of the comment
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// responses:
// "200":
// "$ref": "#/responses/AttachmentList"
// "404":
// "$ref": "#/responses/error"
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
comment := ctx.Comment
if err := comment.LoadAttachments(ctx); err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "LoadAttachments", err)
return
}
ctx.JSON(http.StatusOK, convert.ToAPIAttachments(ctx.Repo.Repository, comment.Attachments))
}
// CreateIssueCommentAttachment creates an attachment and saves the given file
func CreateIssueCommentAttachment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// swagger:operation POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}/assets issue issueCreateIssueCommentAttachment
// ---
// summary: Create a comment attachment
// produces:
// - application/json
// consumes:
// - multipart/form-data
// parameters:
// - name: owner
// in: path
// description: owner of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: repo
// in: path
// description: name of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: id
// in: path
// description: id of the comment
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// - name: name
// in: query
// description: name of the attachment
// type: string
// required: false
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52) (cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1) (cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1dab4f6f3678d79a394da56e6447ebbe1) (cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7) (cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b) (cherry picked from commit 511c519c875a4c4e65c02ef0c4e3b941f4da4371) (cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f610837d34844bb79cda1360ab23b6b1c) (cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c449322901a0acf6d0857eac4716581) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a (cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9e4af612a628171bd4f63a24860c272) (cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d3e9e22017fd74045bcdc1109bd06df) (cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6dd177980f3d9f367122ffc2fec8986) (cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a490faeccb85088fa0981dd50f7199eb8) (cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c20e53ae616a7e53d63c3b51809585fb) (cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a747c14fb1b5b4271db6c10abbf86d586)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
// - name: updated_at
// in: query
// description: time of the attachment's creation. This is a timestamp in RFC 3339 format
// type: string
// format: date-time
// - name: attachment
// in: formData
// description: attachment to upload
// type: file
// required: true
// responses:
// "201":
// "$ref": "#/responses/Attachment"
// "400":
// "$ref": "#/responses/error"
// "404":
// "$ref": "#/responses/error"
feat(quota): Quota enforcement The previous commit laid out the foundation of the quota engine, this one builds on top of it, and implements the actual enforcement. Enforcement happens at the route decoration level, whenever possible. In case of the API, when over quota, a 413 error is returned, with an appropriate JSON payload. In case of web routes, a 413 HTML page is rendered with similar information. This implementation is for a **soft quota**: quota usage is checked before an operation is to be performed, and the operation is *only* denied if the user is already over quota. This makes it possible to go over quota, but has the significant advantage of being practically implementable within the current Forgejo architecture. The goal of enforcement is to deny actions that can make the user go over quota, and allow the rest. As such, deleting things should - in almost all cases - be possible. A prime exemption is deleting files via the web ui: that creates a new commit, which in turn increases repo size, thus, is denied if the user is over quota. Limitations ----------- Because we generally work at a route decorator level, and rarely look *into* the operation itself, `size:repos:public` and `size:repos:private` are not enforced at this level, the engine enforces against `size:repos:all`. This will be improved in the future. AGit does not play very well with this system, because AGit PRs count toward the repo they're opened against, while in the GitHub-style fork + pull model, it counts against the fork. This too, can be improved in the future. There's very little done on the UI side to guard against going over quota. What this patch implements, is enforcement, not prevention. The UI will still let you *try* operations that *will* result in a denial. Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-07-06 10:30:16 +02:00
// "413":
// "$ref": "#/responses/quotaExceeded"
// "422":
// "$ref": "#/responses/validationError"
// "423":
// "$ref": "#/responses/repoArchivedError"
// Check if comment exists and load comment
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
if !canUserWriteIssueCommentAttachment(ctx) {
return
}
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
comment := ctx.Comment
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52) (cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1) (cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1dab4f6f3678d79a394da56e6447ebbe1) (cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7) (cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b) (cherry picked from commit 511c519c875a4c4e65c02ef0c4e3b941f4da4371) (cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f610837d34844bb79cda1360ab23b6b1c) (cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c449322901a0acf6d0857eac4716581) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a (cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9e4af612a628171bd4f63a24860c272) (cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d3e9e22017fd74045bcdc1109bd06df) (cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6dd177980f3d9f367122ffc2fec8986) (cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a490faeccb85088fa0981dd50f7199eb8) (cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c20e53ae616a7e53d63c3b51809585fb) (cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a747c14fb1b5b4271db6c10abbf86d586)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
updatedAt := ctx.Req.FormValue("updated_at")
if len(updatedAt) != 0 {
updated, err := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, updatedAt)
if err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "time.Parse", err)
return
}
err = comment.LoadIssue(ctx)
if err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "LoadIssue", err)
return
}
err = issue_service.SetIssueUpdateDate(ctx, comment.Issue, &updated, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusForbidden, "SetIssueUpdateDate", err)
return
}
}
// Get uploaded file from request
file, header, err := ctx.Req.FormFile("attachment")
if err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "FormFile", err)
return
}
defer file.Close()
filename := header.Filename
if query := ctx.FormString("name"); query != "" {
filename = query
}
attachment, err := attachment.UploadAttachment(ctx, file, setting.Attachment.AllowedTypes, header.Size, &repo_model.Attachment{
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52) (cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1) (cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1dab4f6f3678d79a394da56e6447ebbe1) (cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7) (cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b) (cherry picked from commit 511c519c875a4c4e65c02ef0c4e3b941f4da4371) (cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f610837d34844bb79cda1360ab23b6b1c) (cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c449322901a0acf6d0857eac4716581) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a (cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9e4af612a628171bd4f63a24860c272) (cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d3e9e22017fd74045bcdc1109bd06df) (cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6dd177980f3d9f367122ffc2fec8986) (cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a490faeccb85088fa0981dd50f7199eb8) (cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c20e53ae616a7e53d63c3b51809585fb) (cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a747c14fb1b5b4271db6c10abbf86d586)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
Name: filename,
UploaderID: ctx.Doer.ID,
RepoID: ctx.Repo.Repository.ID,
IssueID: comment.IssueID,
CommentID: comment.ID,
NoAutoTime: comment.Issue.NoAutoTime,
CreatedUnix: comment.Issue.UpdatedUnix,
})
if err != nil {
if upload.IsErrFileTypeForbidden(err) {
ctx.Error(http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, "", err)
} else {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "UploadAttachment", err)
}
return
}
if err := comment.LoadAttachments(ctx); err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "LoadAttachments", err)
return
}
if err = issue_service.UpdateComment(ctx, comment, comment.ContentVersion, ctx.Doer, comment.Content); err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("UpdateComment", err)
return
}
ctx.JSON(http.StatusCreated, convert.ToAPIAttachment(ctx.Repo.Repository, attachment))
}
// EditIssueCommentAttachment updates the given attachment
func EditIssueCommentAttachment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// swagger:operation PATCH /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}/assets/{attachment_id} issue issueEditIssueCommentAttachment
// ---
// summary: Edit a comment attachment
// produces:
// - application/json
// consumes:
// - application/json
// parameters:
// - name: owner
// in: path
// description: owner of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: repo
// in: path
// description: name of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: id
// in: path
// description: id of the comment
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// - name: attachment_id
// in: path
// description: id of the attachment to edit
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// - name: body
// in: body
// schema:
// "$ref": "#/definitions/EditAttachmentOptions"
// responses:
// "201":
// "$ref": "#/responses/Attachment"
// "404":
// "$ref": "#/responses/error"
feat(quota): Quota enforcement The previous commit laid out the foundation of the quota engine, this one builds on top of it, and implements the actual enforcement. Enforcement happens at the route decoration level, whenever possible. In case of the API, when over quota, a 413 error is returned, with an appropriate JSON payload. In case of web routes, a 413 HTML page is rendered with similar information. This implementation is for a **soft quota**: quota usage is checked before an operation is to be performed, and the operation is *only* denied if the user is already over quota. This makes it possible to go over quota, but has the significant advantage of being practically implementable within the current Forgejo architecture. The goal of enforcement is to deny actions that can make the user go over quota, and allow the rest. As such, deleting things should - in almost all cases - be possible. A prime exemption is deleting files via the web ui: that creates a new commit, which in turn increases repo size, thus, is denied if the user is over quota. Limitations ----------- Because we generally work at a route decorator level, and rarely look *into* the operation itself, `size:repos:public` and `size:repos:private` are not enforced at this level, the engine enforces against `size:repos:all`. This will be improved in the future. AGit does not play very well with this system, because AGit PRs count toward the repo they're opened against, while in the GitHub-style fork + pull model, it counts against the fork. This too, can be improved in the future. There's very little done on the UI side to guard against going over quota. What this patch implements, is enforcement, not prevention. The UI will still let you *try* operations that *will* result in a denial. Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-07-06 10:30:16 +02:00
// "413":
// "$ref": "#/responses/quotaExceeded"
// "423":
// "$ref": "#/responses/repoArchivedError"
attach := getIssueCommentAttachmentSafeWrite(ctx)
if attach == nil {
return
}
form := web.GetForm(ctx).(*api.EditAttachmentOptions)
if form.Name != "" {
attach.Name = form.Name
}
if err := repo_model.UpdateAttachment(ctx, attach); err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "UpdateAttachment", attach)
}
ctx.JSON(http.StatusCreated, convert.ToAPIAttachment(ctx.Repo.Repository, attach))
}
// DeleteIssueCommentAttachment delete a given attachment
func DeleteIssueCommentAttachment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// swagger:operation DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}/assets/{attachment_id} issue issueDeleteIssueCommentAttachment
// ---
// summary: Delete a comment attachment
// produces:
// - application/json
// parameters:
// - name: owner
// in: path
// description: owner of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: repo
// in: path
// description: name of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: id
// in: path
// description: id of the comment
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// - name: attachment_id
// in: path
// description: id of the attachment to delete
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// responses:
// "204":
// "$ref": "#/responses/empty"
// "404":
// "$ref": "#/responses/error"
// "423":
// "$ref": "#/responses/repoArchivedError"
attach := getIssueCommentAttachmentSafeWrite(ctx)
if attach == nil {
return
}
if err := repo_model.DeleteAttachment(ctx, attach, true); err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "DeleteAttachment", err)
return
}
ctx.Status(http.StatusNoContent)
}
func getIssueCommentAttachmentSafeWrite(ctx *context.APIContext) *repo_model.Attachment {
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
if !canUserWriteIssueCommentAttachment(ctx) {
return nil
}
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
return getIssueCommentAttachmentSafeRead(ctx)
}
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
func canUserWriteIssueCommentAttachment(ctx *context.APIContext) bool {
// ctx.Comment is assumed to be set in a safe way via a middleware
comment := ctx.Comment
canEditComment := ctx.IsSigned && (ctx.Doer.ID == comment.PosterID || ctx.IsUserRepoAdmin() || ctx.IsUserSiteAdmin()) && ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)
if !canEditComment {
ctx.Error(http.StatusForbidden, "", "user should have permission to edit comment")
return false
}
return true
}
[GITEA] API commentAssignment() to verify the id belongs Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the comment is verified to be related to the repository. There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the commentAssignment() function logic. * TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions * TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction * TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction * TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment * TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment * TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on does not introduce a regression. * TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment * TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments * TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment * TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment (cherry picked from commit d414376d749041da1be288c02fdaa24fddeafd5c) (cherry picked from commit 09db07aeaed167edc66cb832b0aa54b31d14f0d8) (cherry picked from commit f44830c3cba0b9416505a2b0b560cfa096ffeb7c) Conflicts: modules/context/api.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249 (cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15420ce4ca6e92a8bd048d483172de3b)
2024-01-11 11:54:16 +01:00
func getIssueCommentAttachmentSafeRead(ctx *context.APIContext) *repo_model.Attachment {
// ctx.Comment is assumed to be set in a safe way via a middleware
comment := ctx.Comment
attachment, err := repo_model.GetAttachmentByID(ctx, ctx.ParamsInt64("attachment_id"))
if err != nil {
ctx.NotFoundOrServerError("GetAttachmentByID", repo_model.IsErrAttachmentNotExist, err)
return nil
}
if !attachmentBelongsToRepoOrComment(ctx, attachment, comment) {
return nil
}
return attachment
}
func attachmentBelongsToRepoOrComment(ctx *context.APIContext, attachment *repo_model.Attachment, comment *issues_model.Comment) bool {
if attachment.RepoID != ctx.Repo.Repository.ID {
log.Debug("Requested attachment[%d] does not belong to repo[%-v].", attachment.ID, ctx.Repo.Repository)
ctx.NotFound("no such attachment in repo")
return false
}
if attachment.IssueID == 0 || attachment.CommentID == 0 {
log.Debug("Requested attachment[%d] is not in a comment.", attachment.ID)
ctx.NotFound("no such attachment in comment")
return false
}
if comment != nil && attachment.CommentID != comment.ID {
log.Debug("Requested attachment[%d] does not belong to comment[%d].", attachment.ID, comment.ID)
ctx.NotFound("no such attachment in comment")
return false
}
return true
}