Backport #30770 If an user is deactivated, it should not be in the list of users who are suggested to be assigned or review-requested. old assignees or reviewers are not affected. --- *Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH* (cherry picked from commit 022eac4ac8e59f861237cc1e02f7ef117eaf8e30) Conflicts: models/repo/user_repo_test.go because there is one less fixture user compared to Gitea
This commit is contained in:
parent
78517f80bb
commit
2da615c37c
|
@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ func GetRepoAssignees(ctx context.Context, repo *Repository) (_ []*user_model.Us
|
|||
// and just waste 1 unit is cheaper than re-allocate memory once.
|
||||
users := make([]*user_model.User, 0, len(uniqueUserIDs)+1)
|
||||
if len(userIDs) > 0 {
|
||||
if err = e.In("id", uniqueUserIDs.Values()).OrderBy(user_model.GetOrderByName()).Find(&users); err != nil {
|
||||
if err = e.In("id", uniqueUserIDs.Values()).
|
||||
Where(builder.Eq{"`user`.is_active": true}).
|
||||
OrderBy(user_model.GetOrderByName()).
|
||||
Find(&users); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -117,7 +120,8 @@ func GetReviewers(ctx context.Context, repo *Repository, doerID, posterID int64)
|
|||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cond := builder.And(builder.Neq{"`user`.id": posterID})
|
||||
cond := builder.And(builder.Neq{"`user`.id": posterID}).
|
||||
And(builder.Eq{"`user`.is_active": true})
|
||||
|
||||
if repo.IsPrivate || repo.Owner.Visibility == api.VisibleTypePrivate {
|
||||
// This a private repository:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -26,10 +26,17 @@ func TestRepoAssignees(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
repo21 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 21})
|
||||
users, err = repo_model.GetRepoAssignees(db.DefaultContext, repo21)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, users, 3)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, users[0].ID, int64(15))
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, users[1].ID, int64(18))
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, users[2].ID, int64(16))
|
||||
if assert.Len(t, users, 3) {
|
||||
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []int64{15, 16, 18}, []int64{users[0].ID, users[1].ID, users[2].ID})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// do not return deactivated users
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, user_model.UpdateUserCols(db.DefaultContext, &user_model.User{ID: 15, IsActive: false}, "is_active"))
|
||||
users, err = repo_model.GetRepoAssignees(db.DefaultContext, repo21)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
if assert.Len(t, users, 2) {
|
||||
assert.NotContains(t, []int64{users[0].ID, users[1].ID}, 15)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestRepoGetReviewers(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -41,17 +48,19 @@ func TestRepoGetReviewers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
ctx := db.DefaultContext
|
||||
reviewers, err := repo_model.GetReviewers(ctx, repo1, 2, 2)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, reviewers, 4)
|
||||
if assert.Len(t, reviewers, 3) {
|
||||
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []int64{1, 4, 11}, []int64{reviewers[0].ID, reviewers[1].ID, reviewers[2].ID})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// should include doer if doer is not PR poster.
|
||||
reviewers, err = repo_model.GetReviewers(ctx, repo1, 11, 2)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, reviewers, 4)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, reviewers, 3)
|
||||
|
||||
// should not include PR poster, if PR poster would be otherwise eligible
|
||||
reviewers, err = repo_model.GetReviewers(ctx, repo1, 11, 4)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, reviewers, 3)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, reviewers, 2)
|
||||
|
||||
// test private user repo
|
||||
repo2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 2})
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -684,7 +684,9 @@ func TestAPIRepoGetReviewers(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
||||
var reviewers []*api.User
|
||||
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviewers)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, reviewers, 4)
|
||||
if assert.Len(t, reviewers, 3) {
|
||||
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []int64{1, 4, 11}, []int64{reviewers[0].ID, reviewers[1].ID, reviewers[2].ID})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAPIRepoGetAssignees(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue