Fomantic has abrupt breakpoints at 991px and 768px which leads to
variable amounts of wasted screen space below those breakpoints.
Instead, enable fluid width for all viewport sizes below 1200px.
<!--
Please check the following:
1. Make sure you are targeting the `main` branch, pull requests on
release branches are only allowed for bug fixes.
2. Read contributing guidelines:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Describe what your pull request does and which issue you're targeting
(if any)
-->
I fixed typo.
Follows #21119
The manual length check doesn't make sense nowadays:
1. The length check is already done by form's `binding:MaxSize` (then the manual check is unnecessary)
2. The CreateRepository doesn't have such check (then the manual check is inconsistent)
So this PR removes these manual length checks.
Fixes#21184
Regression of #19552
Instead of using `GetBlobByPath` I use the already existing instances.
We need more information from #19530 if that error is still present.
Both allow only limited characters. If you input more, you will get a error
message. So it make sense to limit the characters of the input fields.
Slightly relax the MaxSize of repo's Description and Website
If you are create a new new branch while viewing file or directory, you
get redirected to the root of the repo. With this PR, you keep your
current path instead of getting redirected to the repo root.
In #21088 I accidentally forgot to support multiple branches. It always
checks the default branch, no matter on which branch you are working on.
With this fix, it always shows the error from the current branch. Sorry
for that.
Using `append(args, strings.Fields(arg)...)` is dangerous, it may
generate incorrect results.
For example: `arg1 "the dangerous"` will be splitted to 3 arguments:
`arg1`, `"the`, `dangerous"`. In some cases the incorrect arguments may
lead to security problems.
This fixes#5709 and #17316 by changing the order of listed branches
and tags to show the ones with latest commits atop.
It's achieved with changing underlying "show-ref" git command with
"for-each-ref" as suggested in https://stackoverflow.com/a/5188364
Also, it's passing format string so the output matches "show-ref"
command output.
close#5709close#17316
This PR adds mathematical rendering with KaTeX.
The first step is to add a Goldmark extension that detects the latex
(and tex) mathematics delimiters.
The second step to make this extension only run if math support is
enabled.
The second step is to then add KaTeX CSS and JS to the head which will
load after the dom is rendered.
Fix#3445
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
- Update Chinese translation from comparison.en-us.md
<!--
Please check the following:
1. Make sure you are targeting the `main` branch, pull requests on
release branches are only allowed for bug fixes.
2. Read contributing guidelines:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Describe what your pull request does and which issue you're targeting
(if any)
-->
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Fixes#20998
The basic modal actions were set up for basic confirmation-style modals,
however this modal also has a special form input, which instead requires
a form in the modal itself.
The basic modal actions are indirectly controlled by JS and are simple
`<div>` elements, whereas this requires a `<button>` to submit.
This appears to be similar to how we do it in (for example) the repo
deletion modal.
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
This commit adds the possibility to click the labels in the message
"User added/removed the X label", which will lead to the issues page,
filtered by the clicked label.
This pull requests aims to fix#19768
_I've tried to follow the contribution guidelines as carefully as
possible, but in case I made a mistake: Please correct me._
<!--
Please check the following:
1. Make sure you are targeting the `main` branch, pull requests on
release branches are only allowed for bug fixes.
2. Read contributing guidelines:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Describe what your pull request does and which issue you're targeting
(if any)
-->
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Remove this small, but unnecessary
[module](https://fomantic-ui.com/elements/image.html) and use `img`
selector over previous `.image`. Did a few tests, could not notice any
visual regression.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
<!--
Please check the following:
1. Make sure you are targeting the `main` branch, pull requests on
release branches are only allowed for bug fixes.
2. Read contributing guidelines:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Describe what your pull request does and which issue you're targeting
(if any)
-->
This attempts to correct #21126 , where the content of the page is not
center-aligned.
(Note: I think this contains the right commits - but, those other
commits seem superfluous. I'm not sure I've made the pull request
correctly. I don't often use the pull request pattern when working,
opting to use the merge-request pattern instead for my workplace. If
there are any issues, please let me know and I will try to correct
them.)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
We can not have the `frontend` target depend on golang because of they
way drone is set up. Move the `go-licenses` generation back into `tidy`
where it will now also be checked for consistency during `tidy-check`.
(I assume all `main` branch builds should currently fail [like
this](https://drone.gitea.io/go-gitea/gitea/60244/1/11)).
The reasony why it shouldn't be treated the same as for example `go
generate` is because output files are checked in. tidy is imho the
optimal target to run this after.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This removes the JS dependency in the checks pipeline. JSON output is
different because the previous JS did indent the license data
differently and a JSON key was changed, but the end result is the same
as it gets re-indented by wepack.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
The PyPI name regexp is too restrictive and only permits lowercase characters. This PR adjusts the regexp to add in support for uppercase characters.
Fix#21014
Follow #20987, update docs issue-pull-request-templates.zh-cn.md
<!--
Please check the following:
1. Make sure you are targeting the `main` branch, pull requests on
release branches are only allowed for bug fixes.
2. Read contributing guidelines:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Describe what your pull request does and which issue you're targeting
(if any)
-->
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
There is a mistake in the batched delete comments part of DeleteUser which causes some comments to not be deleted
The code incorrectly updates the `start` of the limit clause resulting in most comments not being deleted.
```go
if err = e.Where("type=? AND poster_id=?", issues_model.CommentTypeComment, u.ID).Limit(batchSize, start).Find(&comments); err != nil {
```
should be:
```go
if err = e.Where("type=? AND poster_id=?", issues_model.CommentTypeComment, u.ID).Limit(batchSize, 0).Find(&comments); err != nil {
```
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
silverwind
