aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues ( #24406 )
...
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175 .
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
c757765a9e
Implement actions artifacts ( #22738 )
...
Implement action artifacts server api.
This change is used for supporting
https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact and
https://github.com/actions/download-artifact in gitea actions. It can
run sample workflow from doc
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts .
The api design is inspired by
https://github.com/nektos/act/blob/master/pkg/artifacts/server.go and
includes some changes from gitea internal structs and methods.
Actions artifacts contains two parts:
- Gitea server api and storage (this pr implement basic design without
some complex cases supports)
- Runner communicate with gitea server api (in comming)
Old pr https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22345 is outdated after
actions merged. I create new pr from main branch.
Add artifacts list in actions workflow page.
2023-05-19 21:37:57 +08:00
bf999e4069
Add Debian package registry ( #24426 )
...
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny
This PR adds a Debian package registry.
You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package ) to build
a *.deb package for testing.
Source packages are not supported at the moment and I did not find
documentation of the architecture "all" and how these packages should be
treated.
Part of #20751 .
Revised copy of #22854 .
---------
Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-02 12:31:35 -04:00
c0ddec8a2a
Revert "Add Debian package registry" ( #24412 )
...
Reverts go-gitea/gitea#22854
2023-04-28 18:06:41 -04:00
bf77e2163b
Add Debian package registry ( #22854 )
...
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny
This PR adds a Debian package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package ) to build
a *.deb package for testing. Source packages are not supported at the
moment and I did not find documentation of the architecture "all" and
how these packages should be treated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-04-28 17:51:36 -04:00
c41bc4f127
Display when a repo was archived ( #22664 )
...
This adds the date a repo is archived to Gitea and shows it in the UI
and API. A feature, that GitHub has been [introduced
recently](https://github.blog/changelog/2022-11-23-repository-archive-date-now-shown-in-ui/ ).
I currently don't know how to correctly deal with the Date in the
template, as different languages have different ways of writing a date.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-04-26 10:46:26 -04:00
ac384c4e1d
Support upload `outputs` and use `needs` context on Actions ( #24230 )
...
See [Defining outputs for
jobs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/defining-outputs-for-jobs )
and [Example usage of the needs
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#example-usage-of-the-needs-context ).
Related to:
- [actions-proto-def
#5 ](https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/5 )
- [act_runner #133 ](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/133 )
<details>
<summary>Tests & screenshots</summary>
Test workflow file:
```yaml
name: outputs
on: push
jobs:
job1:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
output1: ${{ steps.step1.outputs.output1 }}
output2: ${{ steps.step2.outputs.output2 }}
steps:
- name: step1
id: step1
run: |
date -Is > output1
cat output1
echo "output1=$(cat output1)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: step2
id: step2
run: |
cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > output2
cat output2
echo "output2=$(cat output2)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
job2:
needs: job1
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output1 }}
- run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output2 }}
- run: echo ${{ needs.job1.result }}
```
<img width="397" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313322-903e7ebf-49a7-48e2-8c17-95a4581b3284.png ">
<img width="385" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313442-30909135-1711-4b78-a5c6-133fcc79f47c.png ">
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-22 16:12:41 -04:00
fa3495183b
Add migration to fix external unit access mode of owner/admin team ( #24117 )
...
Fix the incorrect migration in #23675 and #24012
External Unit (Tracker and Wiki) access mode should be `read` in
owner/admin team.
2023-04-15 09:52:44 -04:00
b7221bec34
Fix admin team access mode value in team_unit table ( #24012 )
...
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23675
Feedback:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23879#issuecomment-1500923636
2023-04-13 21:06:10 +02:00
6eb856c614
Fix owner team access mode value in team_unit table ( #23675 )
...
All `access_mode` value of Owner Teams are 0(AccessModeNone) in
`team_unit` table, which should be 4(AccessModeOwner)
In `team` table:
In `team_unit` table:
ps: In https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23630 , `access_mode` in
`team_unit` is used to check the team unit permission, but I found that
user can not see issues in owned org repos.
2023-04-03 10:36:35 -04:00
fbd4eaceed
Display image size for multiarch container images ( #23821 )
...
Fixes #23771
Changes the display of different architectures for multiarch images to
show the image size:
2023-04-02 17:53:37 +08:00
b958dba1a0
Improve indices for `action` table ( #23532 )
...
Close #21611
Add the index mentioned in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21611#issuecomment-1451113252 .
Since we already have an index for `("created_unix", "user_id",
"is_deleted")` columns on PostgreSQL, I removed the database type check
to apply this index to all types of databases.
2023-03-24 23:44:33 +08:00
371520d7ab
Display the version of runner in the runner list ( #23490 )
...
Close : #23489
### Change
1. Add version column to action_runner table.
2. Read the runner version from the request header, and update it in DB.
3. Display version in runner list
### Screenshot
2023-03-19 22:19:40 -04:00
8e45fcb63a
Do not store user projects as organization projects ( #23353 )
...
A part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22865
At first, I think we do not need 3 ProjectTypes, as we can check user
type, but it seems that it is not database friendly.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-03-17 21:07:23 +08:00
27494ed20d
Fix missed migration in #22235 ( #23482 )
...
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-03-15 10:33:10 +01:00
2173f14708
Add user webhooks ( #21563 )
...
Currently we can add webhooks for organizations but not for users. This
PR adds the latter. You can access it from the current users settings.
2023-03-10 08:28:32 -06:00
edf98a2dc3
Require approval to run actions for fork pull request ( #22803 )
...
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.
So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks ).
Current strategy:
- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov
GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.
<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png ">
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-24 15:58:49 +08:00
JakobDev
