Fixes#24145
To solve the bug, I added a "computed" `TargetBehind` field to the
`Release` model, which indicates the target branch of a release.
This is particularly useful if the target branch was deleted in the
meantime (or is empty).
I also did a micro-optimization in `calReleaseNumCommitsBehind`. Instead
of checking that a branch exists and then call `GetBranchCommit`, I
immediately call `GetBranchCommit` and handle the `git.ErrNotExist`
error.
This optimization is covered by the added unit test.
#### Added
- API: Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API
- Added `old_ref_name` parameter to allow creating a new branch from a
specific commit, tag, or branch.
- Deprecated `old_branch_name` parameter in favor of the new
`old_ref_name` parameter.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Implements displaying a README.md file present in a users ```.profile```
repository on the users profile page. If no such repository/file is
present, the user's profile page remains unchanged.
Example of user with ```.profile/README.md```
Example of user without ```.profile/README.md```
This pull request closes the feature request in #12233
Special thanks to @techknowlogick for the help in the Gitea discord!
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
The `GetAllCommits` endpoint can be pretty slow, especially in repos
with a lot of commits. The issue is that it spends a lot of time
calculating information that may not be useful/needed by the user.
The `stat` param was previously added in #21337 to address this, by
allowing the user to disable the calculating stats for each commit. But
this has two issues:
1. The name `stat` is rather misleading, because disabling `stat`
disables the Stat **and** Files. This should be separated out into two
different params, because getting a list of affected files is much less
expensive than calculating the stats
2. There's still other costly information provided that the user may not
need, such as `Verification`
This PR, adds two parameters to the endpoint, `files` and `verification`
to allow the user to explicitly disable this information when listing
commits. The default behavior is true.
# ⚠️ Breaking
Many deprecated queue config options are removed (actually, they should
have been removed in 1.18/1.19).
If you see the fatal message when starting Gitea: "Please update your
app.ini to remove deprecated config options", please follow the error
messages to remove these options from your app.ini.
Example:
```
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].ISSUE_INDEXER_QUEUE_TYPE`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]`
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].UPDATE_BUFFER_LEN`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]`
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [F] Please update your app.ini to remove deprecated config options
```
Many options in `[queue]` are are dropped, including:
`WRAP_IF_NECESSARY`, `MAX_ATTEMPTS`, `TIMEOUT`, `WORKERS`,
`BLOCK_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_WORKERS`, they can be removed
from app.ini.
# The problem
The old queue package has some legacy problems:
* complexity: I doubt few people could tell how it works.
* maintainability: Too many channels and mutex/cond are mixed together,
too many different structs/interfaces depends each other.
* stability: due to the complexity & maintainability, sometimes there
are strange bugs and difficult to debug, and some code doesn't have test
(indeed some code is difficult to test because a lot of things are mixed
together).
* general applicability: although it is called "queue", its behavior is
not a well-known queue.
* scalability: it doesn't seem easy to make it work with a cluster
without breaking its behaviors.
It came from some very old code to "avoid breaking", however, its
technical debt is too heavy now. It's a good time to introduce a better
"queue" package.
# The new queue package
It keeps using old config and concept as much as possible.
* It only contains two major kinds of concepts:
* The "base queue": channel, levelqueue, redis
* They have the same abstraction, the same interface, and they are
tested by the same testing code.
* The "WokerPoolQueue", it uses the "base queue" to provide "worker
pool" function, calls the "handler" to process the data in the base
queue.
* The new code doesn't do "PushBack"
* Think about a queue with many workers, the "PushBack" can't guarantee
the order for re-queued unhandled items, so in new code it just does
"normal push"
* The new code doesn't do "pause/resume"
* The "pause/resume" was designed to handle some handler's failure: eg:
document indexer (elasticsearch) is down
* If a queue is paused for long time, either the producers blocks or the
new items are dropped.
* The new code doesn't do such "pause/resume" trick, it's not a common
queue's behavior and it doesn't help much.
* If there are unhandled items, the "push" function just blocks for a
few seconds and then re-queue them and retry.
* The new code doesn't do "worker booster"
* Gitea's queue's handlers are light functions, the cost is only the
go-routine, so it doesn't make sense to "boost" them.
* The new code only use "max worker number" to limit the concurrent
workers.
* The new "Push" never blocks forever
* Instead of creating more and more blocking goroutines, return an error
is more friendly to the server and to the end user.
There are more details in code comments: eg: the "Flush" problem, the
strange "code.index" hanging problem, the "immediate" queue problem.
Almost ready for review.
TODO:
* [x] add some necessary comments during review
* [x] add some more tests if necessary
* [x] update documents and config options
* [x] test max worker / active worker
* [x] re-run the CI tasks to see whether any test is flaky
* [x] improve the `handleOldLengthConfiguration` to provide more
friendly messages
* [x] fine tune default config values (eg: length?)
## Code coverage:
- Very similar to #24550
The correct thing to do is to translate the entire phrase into a single
string. The previous translation assumed all languages have a space
between the "added on" and the date (and that "added on" comes before
the date).
Some languages, like Hebrew, have no space between the "added on" and
the date. For example:
```ini
added_on=נוסף ב-%s
```
("added" becomes נוסף, "on" is ב and when paired with a date we use a
dash to connect ב with the date)
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
- Similar to #24550
- Similar to #24562
The correct thing to do is to translate the entire phrase into a single
string. The previous translation assumed all languages have a space
between the "valid until" and the date (and that "valid until" comes
before the date).
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
The correct thing to do is to translate the entire phrase into a single
string. The previous translation assumed all languages have a space
between the "joined on" and the date (and that "joined on" comes before
the date).
Some languages, like Hebrew, have no space between the "joined on" and
the date. For example:
```ini
joined_on=נרשם ב-%s
```
("joined" becomes נרשם, "on" is ב and when paired with a date we use a
dash to connect ב with the date)
Don't remember why the previous decision that `Code` and `Release` are
non-disable units globally. Since now every unit include `Code` could be
disabled, maybe we should have a new rule that the repo should have at
least one unit. So any unit could be disabled.
Fixes#20960Fixes#7525
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Since the login form label for user_name unconditionally displays
`Username or Email Address` for the `user_name` field, bring matching
LDAP filters to more prominence in the documentation/placeholders.
Signed-off-by: Gary Moon <gary@garymoon.net>
This might be a bit contentious, but I think we should try to limit the
impact of deprecating scoped PATs with the rewrite proposed here we're
working on for v1.20: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24501
We should have a PR opened shortly to re-scope the routes.
Partially for #24457
Major changes:
1. The old `signedUserNameStringPointerKey` is quite hacky, use
`ctx.Data[SignedUser]` instead
2. Move duplicate code from `Contexter` to `CommonTemplateContextData`
3. Remove incorrect copying&pasting code `ctx.Data["Err_Password"] =
true` in API handlers
4. Use one unique `RenderPanicErrorPage` for panic error page rendering
5. Move `stripSlashesMiddleware` to be the first middleware
6. Install global panic recovery handler, it works for both `install`
and `web`
7. Make `500.tmpl` only depend minimal template functions/variables,
avoid triggering new panics
Screenshot:
<details>
</details>
## Changes
- Fixes the case where a logged in user can accept an email invitation
even if their email address does not match the address in the invitation
I am not sure what "new-menu" means, but I think we need to fix these
problems:
1. it shouldn't have "stackable", which makes the items stacked when
width is small. the `new-menu` already has `overflow: auto`
2. `justify-content: center` doesn't work with `overflow: auto` (for
small width), so use `margin: auto`
*
https://bhch.github.io/posts/2021/04/centring-flex-items-and-allowing-overflow-scroll/
3. `runner-new-menu` is dead code (copying & pasting ?)
Partial regression of #24393, not only regression, but broken for long
time, 24393 didn't really improve it but used wrong `overflow: scroll`.
Actually, that "ui secondary filter menu labels" shouldn't be set as
scrollable (I missed that at that time), the problem is: if a "ui menu"
has "dropdown" items, then it should not be scrollable. Otherwise the
dropdown menu can't be shown correctly.
And there are more problems:
* The "issue-filters" shouldn't be used anywhere else (copying&pasting
problem again ....)
* There is also an "issue-actions" container, it should also be fixed.
* There are similar problems on the milestone page.
* The old comment in code: "grid column" doesn't work well.
The major changes of this PR are: use "flex: 1" instead of "ui grid
column".
After this PR, not 100% perfect but much better than before.
Co-Author: @wxiaoguang
It is more convenient that user just need to enter a new branch name after he selects the branch which he want to rename.
So this PR move the function of renaming branch to the page of branches list.
This PR also restyle the button of `new branch`, `download`, `delete`....
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/235277997-413060bb-759f-430a-b5c4-df5e40ffcd28.mov
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
silverwind
