This pattern comes of often during review, so let's fix it once and for
all. Did not test, but changes are trivial enough imho.
(cherry picked from commit 8fe26fb314f1710139728d9118b455fc6a16cce2)
- Switched from jQuery `.attr` to plain javascript `getAttribute` and
`setAttribute`
- Tested the collaborator access mode change, team search box, and
branch protection form. They all work as before
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
(cherry picked from commit 26dbca741114587f4191050a76ee1a36282a2018)
To keep blame info accurate and to avoid [changes like
this](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29977/files#diff-c3422631a14edbe1e508c4b22f0c718db318be08a6e889427802f9b6165d88d6R359),
it's good to always have a trailing comma, so let's enforce it in JS.
This rule is completely automatically fixable with `make lint-js-fix`
and that's what I did here.
(cherry picked from commit 3d751b6ec18e57698ce86b79866031d2c80c2071)
Conflicts:
web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
trivial context conflict because of '3b7b899afa fix commit_status'
- Removed all jQuery AJAX calls and replaced with our fetch wrapper
- Tested the repo collaborator mode dropdown functionality and it works
as before
# Demo using `fetch` instead of jQuery AJAX
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 15d071f4f81a0ad09f260de83cb6402875b4de27)
Fixes#27114.
* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.
For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.
So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
This PR is to allow users to specify status checks by patterns. Users
can enter patterns in the "Status Check Pattern" `textarea` to match
status checks and each line specifies a pattern. If "Status Check" is
enabled, patterns cannot be empty and user must enter at least one
pattern.
Users will no longer be able to choose status checks from the table. But
a __*`Matched`*__ mark will be added to the matched checks to help users
enter patterns.
Benefits:
- Even if no status checks have been completed, users can specify
necessary status checks in advance.
- More flexible. Users can specify a series of status checks by one
pattern.
Before:
After:
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* Remove customized (unmaintained) dropdown, improve aria a11y for dropdown
* fix repo permission
* use action instead of onChange
* re-order the CSS selector
* fix dropdown behavior for repo permissions, make elements inside menu item non-focusable
* use menu/menuitem instead of combobox/option. use tooltip(data-content) for aria-label, prevent from repeated attaching
* click menu item when pressing Enter
* code format
* fix repo permission
* repo setting: prevent from misleading users when error occurs
* fine tune the repo collaboration access mode dropdown (in case the access mode is undefined in the template)
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Reusing `/api/v1` from Gitea UI Pages have pros and cons.
Pros:
1) Less code copy
Cons:
1) API/v1 have to support shared session with page requests.
2) You need to consider for each other when you want to change something about api/v1 or page.
This PR moves all dependencies to API/v1 from UI Pages.
Partially replace #16052
In the case of misuse or misunderstanding from a developer whereby,
if `sel` can receive user-controlled data, jQuery `$(sel)` can lead to the
creation of a new element. Current usage is using hard-coded selectors
in the templates, but nobody prevents that from expanding to
user-controlled somehow.
silverwind
