- Backport of #2518
- The content history table contains the content history of issues and
comments. For issues they are saved with an comment id of zero.
- If you want to check if the issue has an content history, it should
take into account that SQL has `comment_id = 0`, as it otherwise could
return incorrect results when for example the issue already has an
comment that has an content history.
- Fix the code of `HasIssueContentHistory` to take this into account, it
relied on XORM to generate the SQL from the non-default values of the
struct, this wouldn't generate the `comment_id = 0` SQL as `0` is the
default value of an integer.
- Remove an unncessary log (it's not the responsibility of `models`
code to do logging).
- Adds unit test.
- Resolves#2513
(cherry picked from commit 331fa44956)
- Backport of #2507
- The CODEOWNER feature relies on the changed files to determine which
reviewers should be added according to the `CODEOWNER` file.
- The current approach was to 'diff' between the base and head branch,
which seems logical but fail in practice when the pull request is out of
date with the base branch. Therefore it should instead diff between the
head branch and the merge base of the head and base branch, so only the
actual affected files by the pull requests are used, the same approach
is used by the diff of an unmerged pull request.
- Add integration testing (for the feature as well).
- Resolves#2458
(cherry picked from commit fb2795b5bb)
- Backport of #2489
- If the user is searching repositories with an specific topic, adding
any other filter option, such as showing unrelevant repositories or
using another sort Forgejo should remember that 'topic only' was set.
- Adds integration test.
- Resolves#2461
(cherry picked from commit b4360d504c)
It's possible for reviews to not be assiocated with users, when they
were migrated from another forge instance. In the migration code,
there's no sanitization check for author names, so they could contain
HTML tags and thus needs to be properely escaped.
(cherry picked from commit ca798e4cc2)
- It's possible for reviews to not be assiocated with users, when they
were migrated from another forge instance. In the migration code,
there's no sanitization check for author names, so they could contain
HTML tags and thus needs to be properely escaped.
- Pass `$reviewerName` trough `Escape`.
On the wiki and revisions page, information is shown about the last
commit that modified that wiki page. This includes the time it was last
edited and by whom. Verify it is sanitized.
(cherry picked from commit 565e331238)
- On the wiki and revisions page, information is shown about the last
commit that modified that wiki page. This includes the time it was last
edited and by whom. That whole string is not being sanitized (passed
trough `Safe` in the templates), because the last edited bit is
formatted as an HTML element and thus shouldn't be sanitized. The
problem with this is that now `.Author.Name` is not being sanitized.
- This can be exploited, the names of authors and commiters on a Git
commit is user controlled, they can be any value and thus also include
HTML. It's not easy to actually exploit this, as you cannot use the
official git binary to do use, as they actually strip `<` and `>` from
user names (trivia: this behaviour was introduced in the initial commit
of Git). In the integration testing, go-git actually has to generate
this commit as they don't have such restrictions.
- Pass `.Author.Name` trough `Escape` in order to be sanitized.
- Backport of #2416
- The hook regeneration code relies on `git.SupportProcReceive` being
set to determine if the `proc-receive` hook should be written, this
variable is set when the git module is initialized.
- Resolves#2414
(cherry picked from commit 815abad84c)
Backport #28551
RequestReview get deleted on review.
So we don't have to try to load them on comments.
(cherry picked from commit 0ac3186267b717bce7076ef44f883df7720d7a2d)
- Backport of #2403
- In markdown, links are proccessed to be made absolute against the
relevant base in that context. Such that `./src` will be transformed
into `http://example.com/owner/repo/src/branch/main/src`.
- Don't try to make the link absolute if the link has a schema that's
defined in `[markdown].CUSTOM_URL_SCHEMES`, because they can't be made
absolute and doing so could lead to problems (see test case, double
slash was transformed to single slash).
- Adds unit test.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1489
(cherry picked from commit 65b9a959b8)
- Backport of #1805
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1473 made that dangerous
actions such as deletion also would need to type in the owner's name.
This was apparently not reflected to the deletion modal for migrations
that failed or were cancelled.
- Resolves#2404
(cherry picked from commit c38dbd6f88)
- Backport of #2385
- For regular non-image nonvideo links, they should be made relative,
this was done against `r.Ctx.Links.Base`, but since 637451a45e, that
should instead be done by `SrcLink()` if there's branch information set
in the context, because branch and treepath information are no longer
set in `r.Ctx.Links.Base`.
- This is consistent with how #2166 _fixed_ relative links.
- Media is not affected, `TestRender_Media` test doesn't fail.
- Adds unit tests.
- Ref https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1485
(cherry picked from commit a2442793d2)
- Backport of #2370
- When a event is caused by `Ctrl+Enter` jQuery might not wrap the event
and in that case `originalEvent` is not defined. Check for this case.
- Log the error along with showing an toast.
- Resolves#2363
(cherry picked from commit f04589defd)
- Backport of #2349
- When previewing the content in a review, no font size was set. This
resulted in the previewed content being bigger than other text and
therefor creating an noticable inconsistency.
- Set the font size of the previewed content, 14px, this is consistent
with how the content would be rendered.
- `comment-code-cloud` is the class used for the review boxes.
`.ui.tab.markup` means it only applies to the preview tab.
(cherry picked from commit b1aabbf174)
Follow-up of #2282 and #2296 (which tried to address #2278)
One of the issue with the previous PR is that when a conversation on the Files tab was marked as "resolved", it would fetch all the comments for that line (even the outdated ones, which should not be shown on this page - except when explicitly activated).
To properly fix this, I have changed `FetchCodeCommentsByLine` to `FetchCodeConversation`. Its role is to fetch all comments related to a given (review, path, line) and reverted my changes in the template (which were based on a misunderstanding).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2306
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Earl Warren