As the docs of codeberg refer to the strings printed by the Forgejo
ssh servers, this is user-facing and is nice to update to the new
product name.
(cherry picked from commit 103991d73f)
(cherry picked from commit 2a0d3f85f1)
(cherry picked from commit eb2b4ce388)
(cherry picked from commit 0998b51716)
[BRANDING] forgejo log message
(cherry picked from commit d51a046ebe)
(cherry picked from commit d66e1c7b6e)
(cherry picked from commit b5bffe4ce8)
(cherry picked from commit 3fa776d856)
(cherry picked from commit 18d064f472)
(cherry picked from commit c95094e355)
(cherry picked from commit 5784290bc4)
(cherry picked from commit aee336886b)
(cherry picked from commit ec2f60b516)
(cherry picked from commit 7af742a284)
(cherry picked from commit f279e2a264)
(cherry picked from commit fd38cfb14e)
(cherry picked from commit 64c8226618)
(cherry picked from commit b546fb2304)
(cherry picked from commit ad10202177)
(cherry picked from commit c89cab9c2b)
(cherry picked from commit 9579322ec2)
(cherry picked from commit 16b44ad18d)
(cherry picked from commit 2571ff703b)
(cherry picked from commit ad61d9ce9b)
(cherry picked from commit 9b2c45d4d3)
(cherry picked from commit ed01b79a59)
(cherry picked from commit d040b66427)
(cherry picked from commit ffe0bbea48)
(cherry picked from commit 4c1b2c409b)
(cherry picked from commit 3d8338ed10)
(cherry picked from commit a92f044ea9)
[BRANDING] link to forgejo.org/docs instead of docs.gitea.io
(cherry picked from commit 3efafd0e08)
(cherry picked from commit 148185e34b)
(cherry picked from commit 834e264698)
(cherry picked from commit e72fa6eb1e)
[BRANDING] link to forgejo.org/docs instead of docs.gitea.io
Fix the link that was 404.
(cherry picked from commit ae515d7258)
(cherry picked from commit facc2367f0)
(cherry picked from commit 25784b9f21)
(cherry picked from commit 2efc6138d9)
(cherry picked from commit b9d0871631)
(cherry picked from commit f0446e51b9)
(cherry picked from commit 1638aa67fb)
(cherry picked from commit 290db6a018)
(cherry picked from commit 89b87cf542)
(cherry picked from commit 656ed94962)
(cherry picked from commit 036f879f96)
(cherry picked from commit 69eea35f81)
(cherry picked from commit b72e3f4a92)
(cherry picked from commit af606b8574)
(cherry picked from commit 7e47f8135c)
(cherry picked from commit 0e5218cc53)
(cherry picked from commit 7c2a20a528)
(cherry picked from commit 4e94006363)
(cherry picked from commit e47cdfc43f)
(cherry picked from commit 1dcb3e1da4)
(cherry picked from commit 67367c4e0f)
(cherry picked from commit 252087d1ff)
(cherry picked from commit f5977a43e5)
Conflicts:
templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit 594938eb15)
(cherry picked from commit 0257d038a7)
(cherry picked from commit 72821dd140)
[BRANDING] s/gitea/forgejo/ in HTML placeholders
Replaced Gitea branding with Forgejo for input placeholders
Closes: #686
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/752
(cherry picked from commit 6160d37ca9)
(cherry picked from commit df61138c7e)
(cherry picked from commit 1f30566c3f)
(cherry picked from commit 539bb825f5)
(cherry picked from commit bee0f66c86)
(cherry picked from commit 60ad005c95)
(cherry picked from commit 282e26222e)
(cherry picked from commit f9ca551f3d)
(cherry picked from commit b2e04b04c3)
(cherry picked from commit c8f395a03c)
(cherry picked from commit 0d58ce49ae)
(cherry picked from commit c602ddf91e)
(cherry picked from commit 029e37271e)
(cherry picked from commit fdaa96b3cc)
(cherry picked from commit 515d99e27d)
(cherry picked from commit da73274ba1)
(cherry picked from commit ce90b696a0)
(cherry picked from commit b6bf98763b)
(cherry picked from commit 5b380d22d7)
[BRANDING] How to start a runner: URL to Actions admin documentation
(cherry picked from commit da91799e6f)
(cherry picked from commit 28231663b6)
(cherry picked from commit 533a90345b)
(cherry picked from commit 6a0e4e55dd)
(cherry picked from commit f47cd611c6)
(cherry picked from commit 001264b784)
(cherry picked from commit e4099e9bb9)
(cherry picked from commit 3a1885649f)
(cherry picked from commit c42802c710)
(cherry picked from commit a611ce8d6d)
(cherry picked from commit a3d7d10a80)
(cherry picked from commit 52adde671f)
(cherry picked from commit c9a3820fef)
(cherry picked from commit dce40997c9)
(cherry picked from commit 312a6b92f3)
[BRANDING] package templates & links
- Change Gitea to Forgejo where necessary.
- Point all documentation to Forgejo's documentation.
- Resolves#992
(cherry picked from commit d0b78a6ede)
(cherry picked from commit e2382f30ba)
(cherry picked from commit c41cf05a33)
(cherry picked from commit 797e598ae7)
(cherry picked from commit 970031a1c2)
(cherry picked from commit 0c1180e2e1)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/alpine.tmpl
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
templates/package/content/chef.tmpl
templates/package/content/composer.tmpl
templates/package/content/conan.tmpl
templates/package/content/conda.tmpl
templates/package/content/container.tmpl
templates/package/content/cran.tmpl
templates/package/content/debian.tmpl
templates/package/content/generic.tmpl
templates/package/content/go.tmpl
templates/package/content/helm.tmpl
templates/package/content/maven.tmpl
templates/package/content/npm.tmpl
templates/package/content/nuget.tmpl
templates/package/content/pub.tmpl
templates/package/content/pypi.tmpl
templates/package/content/rpm.tmpl
templates/package/content/rubygems.tmpl
templates/package/content/swift.tmpl
templates/package/content/vagrant.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit 42ac9ff2ab)
(cherry picked from commit e390000bce)
(cherry picked from commit 56a437b29b)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1466
[BRANDING] s/Gitea/Forgejo/ in user visible help & comments
- Modify the README of the docker directory to point to the relevant
docker files and documentation for Forgejo.
(cherry picked from commit aca6371215)
(cherry picked from commit 0ba96b1bc4)
(cherry picked from commit 5c8e6b53f1)
Conflicts:
docker/README.md
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit b3121c8004)
(cherry picked from commit 607f870416)
(cherry picked from commit 191d96afe4)
[BRANDING] healthcheck/check.go
(cherry picked from commit d703a236ce)
(cherry picked from commit d84ce3ff20)
(cherry picked from commit 2dbb844606)
(cherry picked from commit 14d3ae7e3a)
[BRANDING] s/Gitea/Forgejo/g in CLI output
(cherry picked from commit 7543c126bb)
(cherry picked from commit b66f422fc3)
(cherry picked from commit a81e4e46f3)
[BRANDING] Gitea->Forgejo in mailer code
(cherry picked from commit b91afea4ff)
(cherry picked from commit 5d7428167c)
(cherry picked from commit ed8101ba6c)
[BRANDING] use 'Forgejo' for Discord, Packagist, and Slack webhooks
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1387
(cherry picked from commit 7dc3a05f5b)
(cherry picked from commit 133f2fc6cc)
[BRANDING] cmd/manager.go
(cherry picked from commit d1dba2c79d)
[BRANDING] pyproject.toml
(cherry picked from commit 7e8c868db2)
(cherry picked from commit 2395995c8b)
(cherry picked from commit dd6fbbf332)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1548
(cherry picked from commit 6f9a5d5cab)
(cherry picked from commit d0635c4a07)
(cherry picked from commit 5f9a8c5744)
(cherry picked from commit 10b96c4567)
(cherry picked from commit 717d52e928)
(cherry picked from commit 5debdb103e)
(cherry picked from commit ded1c1700e)
(cherry picked from commit 52aa23cf7a)
(cherry picked from commit 882c942b06)
Replaces `Gitea` with `Forgejo` in the default config settings for new installs.
This will not affect existing installs.
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/140
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@noreply.codeberg.org>
(cherry picked from commit ca1319aa16)
(cherry picked from commit 52a4d238a0)
(cherry picked from commit f63536538c)
Conflicts:
web_src/js/features/install.js
(cherry picked from commit 861cc434e1)
(cherry picked from commit 0e6ea60c80)
(cherry picked from commit 0cbc0ec15d)
(cherry picked from commit 3cc19b0ae2)
(cherry picked from commit 50fcb885fe)
(cherry picked from commit f6039d4df4)
(cherry picked from commit 5ae5c6ba2d)
(cherry picked from commit f0b565e0ed)
(cherry picked from commit adbd4d2015)
(cherry picked from commit d26c540ffd)
(cherry picked from commit 6df6781b42)
(cherry picked from commit b6fb56e1c4)
(cherry picked from commit bb4f98a0ca)
(cherry picked from commit 6779229f27)
(cherry picked from commit c216c85aee)
(cherry picked from commit dff780bced)
(cherry picked from commit 4e036aa3b6)
(cherry picked from commit 8b3bc3e8a6)
(cherry picked from commit 1e4d852332)
(cherry picked from commit 07a15d1844)
(cherry picked from commit fb44b3e10d)
(cherry picked from commit b212d83319)
(cherry picked from commit 5754971be5)
(cherry picked from commit 0c43b4e82c)
Conflicts:
routers/install/install.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit 2e22a7208a)
(cherry picked from commit 676b0a8a48)
(cherry picked from commit bc4a8bf9bc)
(cherry picked from commit 5e09a4e174)
(cherry picked from commit 712c52a32a)
(cherry picked from commit ba3d93cc4a)
(cherry picked from commit a5a0396abc)
(cherry picked from commit 09b205f30b)
(cherry picked from commit 52b7729e86)
(cherry picked from commit bfe78735e8)
(cherry picked from commit 915c4f7a7b)
(cherry picked from commit 3b1af856bb)
(cherry picked from commit ffe2c0a353)
(cherry picked from commit fd5cc72128)
[GITEA] Fix cancelled migration deletion modal
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1473 made that dangerous
actions such as deletion also would need to type in the owner's name.
This was apparently not reflected to the deletion modal for migrations
that failed or were cancelled.
(cherry picked from commit c38dbd6f88)
(cherry picked from commit 7c07592d01)
(cherry picked from commit 78637af2b6)
[SHARED] make confirmation clearer for dangerous actions
- Currently the confirmation for dangerous actions such as transferring
the repository or deleting it only requires the user to ~~copy paste~~
type the repository name.
- This can be problematic when the user has a fork or another repository
with the same name as an organization's repository, and the confirmation
doesn't make clear that it could be deleting the wrong repository. While
it's mentioned in the dialog, it's better to be on the safe side and
also add the owner's name to be an element that has to be typed for
these dangerous actions.
- Added integration tests.
(cherry picked from commit bf679b24dd)
(cherry picked from commit 1963085dd9)
(cherry picked from commit fb94095d19)
(cherry picked from commit e1d1e46afe)
(cherry picked from commit 93993029e4)
(cherry picked from commit df3b058179)
(cherry picked from commit 8ccc6b9cba)
(cherry picked from commit 9fbe28fca3)
(cherry picked from commit 4ef2be6dc7)
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1873
Moved test from repo_test.go to forgejo_confirmation_repo_test.go to
avoid conflicts.
(cherry picked from commit 83cae67aa3)
- This is a 'front-port' of the already existing patch on v1.21 and
v1.20, but applied on top of what Gitea has done to rework the LTA
mechanism. Forgejo will stick with the reworked mechanism by the Forgejo
Security team for the time being. The removal of legacy code (AES-GCM) has been
left out.
- The current architecture is inherently insecure, because you can
construct the 'secret' cookie value with values that are available in
the database. Thus provides zero protection when a database is
dumped/leaked.
- This patch implements a new architecture that's inspired from: [Paragonie Initiative](https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies).
- Integration testing is added to ensure the new mechanism works.
- Removes a setting, because it's not used anymore.
(cherry picked from commit e3d6622a63)
(cherry picked from commit fef1a6dac5)
(cherry picked from commit b0c5165145)
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)
[this is a follow-up to PR #764]
When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.
-----
Comment:
While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...
I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
(cherry picked from commit 20b5669269)
(cherry picked from commit 1574643a6a)
Update semantic version according to specification
(cherry picked from commit 22510f4130)
Mise à jour de 'Makefile'
(cherry picked from commit c3d85d8409)
(cherry picked from commit 5ea2309851)
(cherry picked from commit ec5217b9d1)
(cherry picked from commit 14f08e364b)
(cherry picked from commit b4465c67b8)
[API] [SEMVER] replace number with version
(cherry picked from commit fba48e6497)
(cherry picked from commit 532ec5d878)
[API] [SEMVER] [v1.20] less is replaced by css
(cherry picked from commit 01ca3a4f42)
(cherry picked from commit 1d928c3ab2)
(cherry picked from commit a39dc804cd)
Conflicts:
webpack.config.js
(cherry picked from commit adc68578b3)
(cherry picked from commit 9b8d98475f)
(cherry picked from commit 2516103974)
(cherry picked from commit 18e6287963)
(cherry picked from commit e9694e67ab)
(cherry picked from commit a9763edaf0)
(cherry picked from commit e2b550f4fb)
(cherry picked from commit 2edac36701)
[API] Forgejo API /api/forgejo/v1 (squash)
Update semver as v1.20 is entering release candidate mode
(cherry picked from commit 4995098ec3)
(cherry picked from commit 578ccfdd27)
(cherry picked from commit 1bf6ac0952)
(cherry picked from commit 2fe16b2bfe)
(cherry picked from commit 7cd9d027ee)
(cherry picked from commit eaed4be2ae)
(cherry picked from commit cc94f3115f)
(cherry picked from commit d7a77e35cc)
(cherry picked from commit cd8eb68ab7)
(cherry picked from commit 68487ac95f)
(cherry picked from commit 616dceb565)
(cherry picked from commit 545fe5975b)
(cherry picked from commit c042cf8eda)
(cherry picked from commit ae5e5a7468)
(cherry picked from commit 8034ef5fa2)
(cherry picked from commit aaf0293034)
(cherry picked from commit daafa8ce58)
(cherry picked from commit 7ca3681d3e)
(cherry picked from commit 39f72cba71)
(cherry picked from commit 60a5917130)
(cherry picked from commit 4853bd9e16)
[API] Move forgejo api file (squash)
- Move the file to accommodate faa28b5a44
(cherry picked from commit bce89351d2)
(cherry picked from commit 11ae7f6e85)
(cherry picked from commit 25e96cfcb2)
(cherry picked from commit 6d8d19b391)
(cherry picked from commit 5afc5c454b)
(cherry picked from commit 86d07b4c24)
(cherry picked from commit e54d869fda)
Fix#28056
This PR will check whether the repo has zero branch when pushing a
branch. If that, it means this repository hasn't been synced.
The reason caused that is after user upgrade from v1.20 -> v1.21, he
just push branches without visit the repository user interface. Because
all repositories routers will check whether a branches sync is necessary
but push has not such check.
For every repository, it has two states, synced or not synced. If there
is zero branch for a repository, then it will be assumed as non-sync
state. Otherwise, it's synced state. So if we think it's synced, we just
need to update branch/insert new branch. Otherwise do a full sync. So
that, for every push, there will be almost no extra load added. It's
high performance than yours.
For the implementation, we in fact will try to update the branch first,
if updated success with affect records > 0, then all are done. Because
that means the branch has been in the database. If no record is
affected, that means the branch does not exist in database. So there are
two possibilities. One is this is a new branch, then we just need to
insert the record. Another is the branches haven't been synced, then we
need to sync all the branches into database.
It will fix#28268 .
<img width="1313" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/cb1e07d5-7a12-4691-a054-8278ba255bfc">
<img width="1318" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/4fd60820-97f1-4c2c-a233-d3671a5039e9">
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
But need to give up some features:
<img width="1312" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/281c0d51-0e7d-473f-bbed-216e2f645610">
However, such abandonment may fix#28055 .
## Backgroud
When the user switches the dashboard context to an org, it means they
want to search issues in the repos that belong to the org. However, when
they switch to themselves, it means all repos they can access because
they may have created an issue in a public repo that they don't own.
<img width="286" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/182dcd5b-1c20-4725-93af-96e8dfae5b97">
It's a confusing design. Think about this: What does "In your
repositories" mean when the user switches to an org? Repos belong to the
user or the org?
Whatever, it has been broken by #26012 and its following PRs. After the
PR, it searches for issues in repos that the dashboard context user owns
or has been explicitly granted access to, so it causes #28268.
## How to fix it
It's not really difficult to fix it. Just extend the repo scope to
search issues when the dashboard context user is the doer. Since the
user may create issues or be mentioned in any public repo, we can just
set `AllPublic` to true, which is already supported by indexers. The DB
condition will also support it in this PR.
But the real difficulty is how to count the search results grouped by
repos. It's something like "search issues with this keyword and those
filters, and return the total number and the top results. **Then, group
all of them by repo and return the counts of each group.**"
<img width="314" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/5206eb20-f8f5-49b9-b45a-1be2fcf679f4">
Before #26012, it was being done in the DB, but it caused the results to
be incomplete (see the description of #26012).
And to keep this, #26012 implement it in an inefficient way, just count
the issues by repo one by one, so it cannot work when `AllPublic` is
true because it's almost impossible to do this for all public repos.
1bfcdeef4c/modules/indexer/issues/indexer.go (L318-L338)
## Give up unnecessary features
We may can resovle `TODO: use "group by" of the indexer engines to
implement it`, I'm sure it can be done with Elasticsearch, but IIRC,
Bleve and Meilisearch don't support "group by".
And the real question is, does it worth it? Why should we need to know
the counts grouped by repos?
Let me show you my search dashboard on gitea.com.
<img width="1304" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/2bca2d46-6c71-4de1-94cb-0c9af27c62ff">
I never think the long repo list helps anything.
And if we agree to abandon it, things will be much easier. That is this
PR.
## TODO
I know it's important to filter by repos when searching issues. However,
it shouldn't be the way we have it now. It could be implemented like
this.
<img width="1316" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/99ee5f21-cbb5-4dfe-914d-cb796cb79fbe">
The indexers support it well now, but it requires some frontend work,
which I'm not good at. So, I think someone could help do that in another
PR and merge this one to fix the bug first.
Or please block this PR and help to complete it.
Finally, "Switch dashboard context" is also a design that needs
improvement. In my opinion, it can be accomplished by adding filtering
conditions instead of "switching".
This fixes a regression from #25859
If a tag has no Release, Gitea will show a Link to create a Release for
the Tag if the User has the Permission to do this, but the variable to
indicate that is no longer set.
Used here:
1bfcdeef4c/templates/repo/tag/list.tmpl (L39-L41)
Fix#25473
Although there was `m.Post("/login/oauth/access_token", CorsHandler()...`,
it never really worked, because it still lacks the "OPTIONS" handler.
Fixes#27819
We have support for two factor logins with the normal web login and with
basic auth. For basic auth the two factor check was implemented at three
different places and you need to know that this check is necessary. This
PR moves the check into the basic auth itself.
The steps to reproduce it.
First, create a new oauth2 source.
Then, a user login with this oauth2 source.
Disable the oauth2 source.
Visit users -> settings -> security, 500 will be displayed.
This is because this page only load active Oauth2 sources but not all
Oauth2 sources.
Fix nil access for inactive auth sources.
> Render failed, failed to render template:
user/settings/security/security, error: template error:
builtin(static):user/settings/security/accountlinks:32:20 : executing
"user/settings/security/accountlinks" at <$providerData.IconHTML>: nil
pointer evaluating oauth2.Provider.IconHTML
Code tries to access the auth source of an `ExternalLoginUser` but the
list contains only the active auth sources.
After many refactoring PRs for the "locale" and "template context
function", now the ".locale" is not needed for web templates any more.
This PR does a clean up for:
1. Remove `ctx.Data["locale"]` for web context.
2. Use `ctx.Locale` in `500.tmpl`, for consistency.
3. Add a test check for `500 page` locale usage.
4. Remove the `Str2html` and `DotEscape` from mail template context
data, they are copy&paste errors introduced by #19169 and #16200 . These
functions are template functions (provided by the common renderer), but
not template data variables.
5. Make email `SendAsync` function mockable (I was planning to add more
tests but it would make this PR much too complex, so the tests could be
done in another PR)
From issue https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27314
When act_runner in `host` mode on Windows. `upload_artifact@v3` actions
use `path.join` to generate `itemPath` params when uploading artifact
chunk. `itemPath` is encoded as `${artifact_name}\${artifact_path}`.
<del>It's twice query escaped from ${artifact_name}/${artifact_path}
that joined by Windows slash \.</del>
**So we need convert Windows slash to linux**.
In https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27314, runner shows logs
from `upload_artifact@v3` like with `%255C`:
```
[artifact-cases/test-artifact-cases] | ::error::Unexpected response. Unable to upload chunk to http://192.168.31.230:3000/api/actions_pipeline/_apis/pipelines/workflows/6/artifacts/34d628a422db9367c869d3fb36be81f5/upload?itemPath=more-files%255Css.json
```
But in gitea server at the same time, But shows `%5C`
```
2023/10/27 19:29:51 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed PUT /api/actions_pipeline/_apis/pipelines/workflows/6/artifacts/34d628a422db9367c869d3fb36be81f5/upload?itemPath=more-files%5Css.json for 192.168.31.230:55340, 400 Bad Request in 17.6ms @ <autogenerated>:1(actions.artifactRoutes.uploadArtifact-fm)
```
I found `%255C` is escaped by
`https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/blob/main/dist/index.js#L2329`.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Currently this feature is only available to admins, but there is no
clear reason why. If a user can actually merge pull requests, then this
seems fine as well.
This is useful in situations where direct pushes to the repository are
commonly done by developers.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Hello there,
Cargo Index over HTTP is now prefered over git for package updates: we
should not force users who do not need the GIT repo to have the repo
created/updated on each publish (it can still be created in the packages
settings).
The current behavior when publishing is to check if the repo exist and
create it on the fly if not, then update it's content.
Cargo HTTP Index does not rely on the repo itself so this will be
useless for everyone not using the git protocol for cargo registry.
This PR only disable the creation on the fly of the repo when publishing
a crate.
This is linked to #26844 (error 500 when trying to publish a crate if
user is missing write access to the repo) because it's now optional.
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Loïc Dachary