Adds a feature [like GitHub has](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork) (step 7).
If you create a new PR from a forked repo, you can select (and change later, but only if you are the PR creator/poster) the "Allow edits from maintainers" option.
Then users with write access to the base branch get more permissions on this branch:
* use the update pull request button
* push directly from the command line (`git push`)
* edit/delete/upload files via web UI
* use related API endpoints
You can't merge PRs to this branch with this enabled, you'll need "full" code write permissions.
This feature has a pretty big impact on the permission system. I might forgot changing some things or didn't find security vulnerabilities. In this case, please leave a review or comment on this PR.
Closes#17728
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reusing `/api/v1` from Gitea UI Pages have pros and cons.
Pros:
1) Less code copy
Cons:
1) API/v1 have to support shared session with page requests.
2) You need to consider for each other when you want to change something about api/v1 or page.
This PR moves all dependencies to API/v1 from UI Pages.
Partially replace #16052
Currently the "File Changed" tab of a PR is somehow broken. This is also true for the current release 1.16.0.
When you are on the "File Changed" tab, and want to look at code excerpt before or after the code changes, the layout breaks. You can test this on try.gitea.io here: https://try.gitea.io/testnotexisting/magic_enum/pulls/2/files
The problem occurs for the unified view and for the split view.
Kind of the same problem was there for commenting a line of code, this was fixed in #18321 and #18403.
For consistency, I changed the solution of #18321, I removed the ``colspan`` and instead added a ``<td>``. The goal was to have code similarly with the split view.
Also the separator line in the split view was in the wrong column, this was fixed too.* more consistent unified review comment
Fix#18516
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Comment dialogs for inline comments should appear in 4th column (not 3rd column), this PR changes the column that the inline review comment is associated with.
This problem has occurred due to an unrecognised conflict between #17562 and #17315.
Fix as zeripath suggested in #18320Fix#18320
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
In the case of misuse or misunderstanding from a developer whereby,
if `sel` can receive user-controlled data, jQuery `$(sel)` can lead to the
creation of a new element. Current usage is using hard-coded selectors
in the templates, but nobody prevents that from expanding to
user-controlled somehow.
Since we are using EasyMDE now, we do not need to keep the SimpleMDE code anymore.
This PR removes all legacy SimpleMDE code, and makes some related changes:
* `createCommentEasyMDE` can accept native DOM element, and it doesn't need `jQuery.data` to store EasyMDE editor object (as discussed about the frontend guideline).
* introduce `getAttachedEasyMDE` to get the attached EasyMDE editor object, it's easier to find all the usage of EasyMDE.
* rename variable names from `$simplemde` to `easyMDE`, the `$` was incorrect because it is a EasyMDE editor, not a jQuery object.
With this PR, it will be easier to do more refactoring or replacing EasyMDE with other editors.
- Update all JS dependencies to latest versions
- Add new lint rules, enable es2022 eslint parser features
- Disable github/no-then, I feel the rule was too restricting
* Add new JS linter rules
Adds a few useful rules from eslint-plugin-github. Notable changes:
- Forbid dataset usage, its camel-casing behaviour makes it hard to
grep for attributes.
- Forbid .then() and .catch(), we should generally prefer await for new
code. For rare cases where they are useful, a eslint-disable-line
directive can be set.
- Add docs js to linting
* also enable github/array-foreach
* small tweak
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Instead of directly attaching the add-code-comment on click handler to
the a.add-code-comment elements - make this an event handler on the
document instead.
Fix#17736
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
This fix updates issue labels one by one, and won't cause database deadlock.
In future, we can use a batch API to update all changed labels by one request.
qwerty287
