mirror of
1
Fork 0
gotosocial/vendor/github.com/cilium/ebpf/ARCHITECTURE.md

87 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Architecture of the library
===
ELF -> Specifications -> Objects -> Links
ELF
---
BPF is usually produced by using Clang to compile a subset of C. Clang outputs
an ELF file which contains program byte code (aka BPF), but also metadata for
maps used by the program. The metadata follows the conventions set by libbpf
shipped with the kernel. Certain ELF sections have special meaning
and contain structures defined by libbpf. Newer versions of clang emit
additional metadata in BPF Type Format (aka BTF).
The library aims to be compatible with libbpf so that moving from a C toolchain
to a Go one creates little friction. To that end, the [ELF reader](elf_reader.go)
is tested against the Linux selftests and avoids introducing custom behaviour
if possible.
The output of the ELF reader is a `CollectionSpec` which encodes
all of the information contained in the ELF in a form that is easy to work with
in Go.
### BTF
The BPF Type Format describes more than just the types used by a BPF program. It
includes debug aids like which source line corresponds to which instructions and
what global variables are used.
[BTF parsing](internal/btf/) lives in a separate internal package since exposing
it would mean an additional maintenance burden, and because the API still
has sharp corners. The most important concept is the `btf.Type` interface, which
also describes things that aren't really types like `.rodata` or `.bss` sections.
`btf.Type`s can form cyclical graphs, which can easily lead to infinite loops if
one is not careful. Hopefully a safe pattern to work with `btf.Type` emerges as
we write more code that deals with it.
Specifications
---
`CollectionSpec`, `ProgramSpec` and `MapSpec` are blueprints for in-kernel
objects and contain everything necessary to execute the relevant `bpf(2)`
syscalls. Since the ELF reader outputs a `CollectionSpec` it's possible to
modify clang-compiled BPF code, for example to rewrite constants. At the same
time the [asm](asm/) package provides an assembler that can be used to generate
`ProgramSpec` on the fly.
Creating a spec should never require any privileges or be restricted in any way,
for example by only allowing programs in native endianness. This ensures that
the library stays flexible.
Objects
---
`Program` and `Map` are the result of loading specs into the kernel. Sometimes
loading a spec will fail because the kernel is too old, or a feature is not
enabled. There are multiple ways the library deals with that:
* Fallback: older kernels don't allow naming programs and maps. The library
automatically detects support for names, and omits them during load if
necessary. This works since name is primarily a debug aid.
* Sentinel error: sometimes it's possible to detect that a feature isn't available.
In that case the library will return an error wrapping `ErrNotSupported`.
This is also useful to skip tests that can't run on the current kernel.
Once program and map objects are loaded they expose the kernel's low-level API,
e.g. `NextKey`. Often this API is awkward to use in Go, so there are safer
wrappers on top of the low-level API, like `MapIterator`. The low-level API is
useful when our higher-level API doesn't support a particular use case.
Links
---
BPF can be attached to many different points in the kernel and newer BPF hooks
tend to use bpf_link to do so. Older hooks unfortunately use a combination of
syscalls, netlink messages, etc. Adding support for a new link type should not
pull in large dependencies like netlink, so XDP programs or tracepoints are
out of scope.
Each bpf_link_type has one corresponding Go type, e.g. `link.tracing` corresponds
to BPF_LINK_TRACING. In general, these types should be unexported as long as they
don't export methods outside of the Link interface. Each Go type may have multiple
exported constructors. For example `AttachTracing` and `AttachLSM` create a
tracing link, but are distinct functions since they may require different arguments.