Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/153
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/123
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/299
(cherry picked from commit 08dcef0c8c)
[DOCS] CONTRIBUTING/RELEASE: https://forgejo.org/docs/admin
Because the version is not displayed on the landing page of Forgejo,
there cannot be a link to a versionned documentation. There must exist
a link that points to the latest version on the website for the
forgejo instance to display.
Better but more complicated approaches could be to:
* Embed the documentation in Forgejo
* Allow the admin to not display the help
* Allow the admin to display a versionned help or not
(cherry picked from commit 83cc389239)
(cherry picked from commit 5df52b8a4f)
(cherry picked from commit 9a66b3d70b)
[DOCS] CONTRIBUTING/RELEASE: reminder to update FORGEJO_VERSION
(cherry picked from commit 2a4d0bd164)
(cherry picked from commit d68576ba67)
[DOCS] CONTRIBUTING: updates
* Remove obsolete description of the well being & moderation team and
replace them with a link to the moderation email.
* Remove description of the governance process and replace with a link
to the governance readme that did not exist at the time.
* Add links to the Forgejo documentation
(cherry picked from commit df749da272)
(cherry picked from commit 4da39128c5)
(cherry picked from commit f442ca6f40)
(cherry picked from commit 031928c447)
(cherry picked from commit 1e6ba47216)
(cherry picked from commit 8916a1f8c6)
(cherry picked from commit 663e28c412)
(cherry picked from commit d56b130baa)
[DOCS] CONTRIBUTING (squash)
(cherry picked from commit 0dc4b6e5c9)
(cherry picked from commit 52f2163807)
(cherry picked from commit 47d0ae3e10)
(cherry picked from commit 7757a5c34c)
(cherry picked from commit 5b4d25bd03)
(cherry picked from commit 78798cc25e)
(cherry picked from commit 3001fb8c7b)
(cherry picked from commit da27bf1bc5)
(cherry picked from commit 2fb13da8ed)
Although it would be possible to modify these files, it would create
conflicts when rebasing. Instead, this commit removes them entirely
and another commit can start from scratch, borrowing content from the
original files.
The drawback of this approach is that some content updates from Gitea
that also need updating in Forgejo will have to be copy/pasted
instead of being merged.
(cherry picked from commit eb85782115)
(cherry picked from commit 34401f2004)
(cherry picked from commit ef43b1c691)
(cherry picked from commit d17fe25e2f)
(cherry picked from commit 3f65dea3e7)
(cherry picked from commit 3cacb64a1b)
(cherry picked from commit b531b014b7)
(cherry picked from commit adf6e7a840)
(cherry picked from commit 68c19d977d)
(cherry picked from commit 31aa8647ec)
(cherry picked from commit be70dd7208)
(cherry picked from commit 7f44bb60b1)
(cherry picked from commit 5098f1224b)
(cherry picked from commit dc7a859144)
(cherry picked from commit f1e78dd006)
(cherry picked from commit c41ba7a148)
(cherry picked from commit f1da66a918)
(cherry picked from commit 99194a3664)
(cherry picked from commit 52f356f6a9)
(cherry picked from commit c93ffa72ae)
(cherry picked from commit 477c7454d3)
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/230
(cherry picked from commit 87d56bf6c7)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash)
base64 -w0 to avoid wrapping when the doer name is long as it creates
a broken config.json
(cherry picked from commit 9efdc27e49)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) generate .xz files and sources
Generate .xz files
Check .sha256
Generate the source tarbal
(cherry picked from commit 7afec520c4)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) release notes
(cherry picked from commit d8f4f4807b)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) publish and sign release
(cherry picked from commit a52778c747)
(cherry picked from commit cf2ec62740)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) version
use Actions environment variables in Makefile (#25319) (#25318)
uses Actions variable to determine the version. But Forgejo builds
happen in a container where they are not available. Do not use them.
Also verify the version of the binary is as expected for sanity check.
(cherry picked from commit 6decf111a1)
(cherry picked from commit 206d0b3886)
[CI] read STORED_VERSION_FILE if available
(cherry picked from commit af74085ebf)
[CI] backward compatible executable compilation
Add a new static-executable target to use in Dockerfiles and restore
the $(EXECUTABLE) target to what it was before to for backward
compatibility.
The release process now builds static executables instead of
dynamically linked ones which makes them more portable. It changes the
requirements at compile time and is not backward compatible. In
particular it may break packaging that rely on the target that
currently creates a dynamically linked executable.
(cherry picked from commit 84d02a174a)
(cherry picked from commit 854be47328)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) doc / ca / verbosity
- Document workflow
- Increase verbosity if VERBOSE=true
- Download the Certificate Authority if behind the VPN
(cherry picked from commit 168d5d5869)
(cherry picked from commit 8756c9a72a)
(cherry picked from commit f9d75d4705)
(cherry picked from commit 64f76f4ab2)
(cherry picked from commit 5d02454155)
[CI] Forgejo Actions workflows
(cherry picked from commit 3ff59b5379)
(cherry picked from commit 8af826a6f7)
(cherry picked from commit d7c09d9cc8)
[CI] use the docker label instead of ubuntu-latest
(cherry picked from commit b6a6470db6)
[CI] all tests need compliance before proceeding
(cherry picked from commit b35c496f2c)
(cherry picked from commit 36a4148a8e)
(cherry picked from commit 7ffcffa653)
(cherry picked from commit 8a246d296e)
(cherry picked from commit dd0b6e1826)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) MySQL optimization
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/976
(cherry picked from commit b4b8c489e6)
(cherry picked from commit 1e861db4af)
f92e0a4018 added minio to the tests/pgsql.ini.tmpl and Forgejo CI does
not run a minio server. It will if there are external storage related
changes at some point but it is not the case now so it is not worth
the burden.
(cherry picked from commit 4cfbf4718d)
(cherry picked from commit 9bd644d601)
(cherry picked from commit 604636c7c4)
(cherry picked from commit 341cdb8540)
(cherry picked from commit 57bdc91de5)
(cherry picked from commit c6ec6517b4)
(cherry picked from commit 2f03fc1b29)
(cherry picked from commit aaecd10966)
(cherry picked from commit 7025ff7b06)
(cherry picked from commit 15e6485ae1)
(cherry picked from commit 5f7b23c659)
(cherry picked from commit a74d7ce6c5)
(cherry picked from commit f552e2fc56)
(cherry picked from commit 9fa4a90baa)
(cherry picked from commit a8be33da60)
(cherry picked from commit 205f7897aa)
(cherry picked from commit a6074d765d)
(cherry picked from commit c2a7aaeee8)
(cherry picked from commit 6b6007fbce)
(cherry picked from commit 63608a221e)
(cherry picked from commit 5cfe60baa7)
(cherry picked from commit 2af4c73d12)
(cherry picked from commit 1985959bfe)
(cherry picked from commit 880424c77e)
(cherry picked from commit c78a861d1b)
(cherry picked from commit 25c1227011)
(cherry picked from commit 7195e894ee)
(cherry picked from commit cf15153873)
(cherry picked from commit 9bee773c95)
(cherry picked from commit 581c3060da)
(cherry picked from commit bf550f9b2c)
(cherry picked from commit b570eca0b9)
[CI] implementation: Woodpecker based CI (squash)
Upgrade xgo to Go v1.20 for building binaries
(cherry picked from commit 6308c776b6)
[CI] v1.20: switch PR check from Woodpecker CI to Forgejo Actions
The PR checks for v1.19 still rely on Woodpecker CI. Keeping
.woodpecker in v1.20 while both Woodpecker CI & Forgejo Actions are
enabled would dupicate the checks.
The release process in releases remains Woodpecker CI.
(cherry picked from commit 93e42f3f53)
(cherry picked from commit 599c5162ad)
(cherry picked from commit 6f8b723a55)
(cherry picked from commit e238d7d72f)
(cherry picked from commit 2258fb575b)
(cherry picked from commit 52195d9456)
(cherry picked from commit 2f95143000)
(cherry picked from commit 42f2f8731e)
[CLI] implement forgejo-cli actions register (squash) no private
Do not go through the private API, directly modify the database
(cherry picked from commit 1ba7c0d39d)
Use a real button and add an aria-label.
Additionally, show the button whenever it is focused.
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/998 for explanation.
Our handling of this button is now equal to that of GitHub.
Nothing has changed visually.
Before:
emmm, don't know how to write a good title to describe this issue.
If you have a good idea, I can change the title.
The fix code is copied from L122. Not sure it is right or not.
@lunny
Maybe `DefaultBranchBranch` is also typo?
Two `Branch` in variable name .
Issue filters are being used on repo list page and on milestone issues
page, and the code is mostly duplicated.
This PR does the following changes:
- move issue filters into a shared template
- allow filtering milestone issues by project, so no need to hide this
filter on milestone issues page
- remove some dead code (e. g. issue actions in milestone issues
template)
- fix label filter dropdown width
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
The `FileBlame` function looks strange, it has `revision` as argument
but doesn't use it.
Since the function never be used, I think we could just remove it.
If anyone thinks it should be kept, please help fix `revision`.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Before:
After:
This issue comes from the change in #25468.
`LoadProject` will always return at least one record, so we use
`ProjectID` to check whether an issue is linked to a project in the old
code.
As other `issue.LoadXXX` functions, we need to check the return value
from `xorm.Session.Get`.
In recent unit tests, we only test `issueList.LoadAttributes()` but
don't test `issue.LoadAttributes()`. So I added a new test for
`issue.LoadAttributes()` in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
Related issue: #18368
It doesn't seem right to "guess" the file encoding/BOM when using API to
upload files.
The API should save the uploaded content as-is.
we refactored `userIDFromToken` for the token parsing part into a new
function `parseToken`. `parseToken` returns the string `token` from
request, and a boolean `ok` representing whether the token exists or
not. So we can distinguish between token non-existence and token
inconsistency in the `verfity` function, thus solving the problem of no
proper error message when the token is inconsistent.
close#24439
related #22119
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Loïc Dachary